David Adolf Axelrod

Senior White House advisor David Axelrod apparently thinks that some manifestations of the first amendment are healthy and others are not.  On the recent Tea Party Protests Axelrod said, “I think any time you have severe economic conditions there is always an element of disaffection that can mutate into something that’s unhealthy.”

Wow, this sounds incredibly familiar.  In 1919, Attorney General A. Michell Palmer, using J Edgar Hoover as a proxy, employed similar sentiments to enact a series of raids on political dissidents.  “There could be no nice distinctions drawn between the theoretical ideals of the radicals and their actual violations of our national laws,” Palmer claimed in 1920.

In the ‘Palmer Raids’, Hoover targeted mostly communists and anarchists.  In 1919, they rounded up 249 citizens, including Emma Goldman and Alexander Berkman, and sent them ‘home’ (to Russia) aboard the Soviet Arc. The next year over 6,000 were arrested in a raid against the radical IWW workers union.

Now in all fairness, some of these raids were in response to a series of bombings (not simply ‘severe economic conditions’ – though government inflation was causing a severe recession after World War I).  Perhaps Axelrod does not believe in instituting the Holder Raids, but his statement does indicate a generally dismissive and arrogant tone toward dissenting voices.

High ranking government officials, simply through veiled statements, can influence how ordinary Americans interact.  Axelrod’s ‘unhealthy’ could be translated by some boob into shunning the tea party protester.  Get a few boobs together, all fearful of ‘unhealthy’ dissent, and you have a de facto suppression of speech.