<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Brothers Austrian &#187; Cafe Hayek</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brothersaustrian.com/tag/cafe-hayek/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brothersaustrian.com</link>
	<description>An economics blog in the Austrian tradition, written by two brothers, one teacher and one bond trader</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2011 13:49:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>How Do We Create a Tangible Money Supply?</title>
		<link>http://www.brothersaustrian.com/how-do-we-create-a-tangible-money-supply/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brothersaustrian.com/how-do-we-create-a-tangible-money-supply/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 16:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MisesBeliever</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Gelfound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cafe Hayek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money supply]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brothersaustrian.com/?p=322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A great article posted in WSJ by Bob Gelfond, brought to me by Cafe Hayek briefly lays suggests that the governments influence over the money supply can have a disastrous role. The problem is that he failed to incorporate some very important terminology from Austrian Business Cycle Thoery: malinvestment. Us Austrians need to point people [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A great article posted in <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703558004574584243768781988.html">WSJ by Bob Gelfond</a>, brought to me by <a href="http://cafehayek.com/" target="_self">Cafe Hayek </a>briefly lays suggests that the governments influence over the money supply can have a disastrous role. The problem is that he failed to incorporate some very important terminology from Austrian<a href="http://blog.mises.org/archives/004399.asp"> Business Cycle Thoery: malinvestment</a>.</p>
<p>Us Austrians need to point people to fact that <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>malinvestment</strong></span> is the single most destructive product of fiat currencies.</p>
<p>Recently I went to a panel discussion that included UBS&#8217;s Art Cashin. He described how Y2K&#8217;s money expansion helped lead to a bubble: the run up in tech stocks at the turn of the century and later a housing boom. As we know such investments  cost many investors dearly. What Cashin was describing was a classic case of <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>malinvestment, </strong></span>however he, as well as the other panelists, coined such scenario&#8217;s as bubbles.  I wish we could somehow get prominant speakers to use ABCT terminology such as <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>malinvestment</strong></span> instead of terms like &#8220;bubbles&#8221; to draw people into reading more Von Mises literature. The literature so compelling I feel it would be hard not to grow are ranks exponentially in the near future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brothersaustrian.com/how-do-we-create-a-tangible-money-supply/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

